A small proportion of brain tumors are attributed to a genetic predispositi
on; however, the hereditary proportion is undetermined. This study evaluate
s the degree of familial aggregation of cancer in a large series of brain t
umor patients. Our study included 5,088 relatives of 639 probands (3,810 fi
rst- and 1,278 second-degree), diagnosed with a glioma between June 1992 an
d June 1995 at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Housto
n, Texas, with diagnosis under age 65 years, and residents of the United St
ates or Canada. We conducted an in-person or telephone interview with patie
nts and/or their next-of-kin, and obtained family histories for the proband
s' first-degree (parents, siblings, offspring) and selected second-degree r
elatives taunts, uncles, grandparents) using a sequential sampling strategy
. Reported cancers were documented by medical records and/or death certific
ates (if the relative was deceased and medical records were unavailable). W
e conducted segregation analysis using the Pedigree Analysis Program (PAP).
The analyses were divided into two categories: (1) all 639 families, and (
2) a subset of families whose gliomas stained positive on p53 immunohistoch
emistry analysis. We demonstrated that a multifactorial Mendelian model was
favored, while a model postulating a purely environmental cause of brain c
ancer was rejected. This study indicates that familial cancer in relatives
of glioma patients are probably a result of multigenic action, and familial
clustering of cancer among relatives of glioma patients may involve unknow
n environmental exposures. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.