A systematic review identified nine randomized, controlled trials (both pub
lished and unpublished) which assessed the efficacy of nafarelin during IVF
compared with other gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, The t
rials included 1014 women (nafarelin n = 597) in protocols employing three
different dosage regimens, long and short stimulation protocols, and three
comparative GnRH agonists (buserelin n = 348; triptorelin n = 14, and leupr
olide n = 55), The meta-analysis of the data showed that pregnancy rates pe
r embryo transfer with nafarelin were equivalent to those obtained with oth
er GnRH agonists, Nafarelin and other agonists were also comparable in term
s of several intermediate NF outcomes, including fertilization rates, numbe
r of oocytes retrieved, peak oestradiol concentrations, and cycle cancellat
ions, Women treated with nafarelin required fewer ampoules of human menopau
sal gonadotrophin (HMG)/FSH for ovarian stimulation and fewer days of stimu
lation. Safety results from both the meta-analysis and a qualitative analys
is of 12 additional reports suggested that adverse effects were within the
accepted tolerance range; the most frequent adverse effects were hypo-oestr
ogenic symptoms, In conclusion, the overall efficacy of nafarelin was equiv
alent to that of other GnRH agonists, The possibility that the reduced gona
dotrophin requirements in women taking nafarelin will translate into cost s
avings per IVF treatment cycle requires further study.