A preliminary account of phonological and morphophonological perception inyoung children with and without otitis media

Citation
Kc. Petinou et al., A preliminary account of phonological and morphophonological perception inyoung children with and without otitis media, INT J LAN C, 36(1), 2001, pp. 21-42
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
ISSN journal
13682822 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
21 - 42
Database
ISI
SICI code
1368-2822(200101/03)36:1<21:APAOPA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
This investigation examined the effects of otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated fluctuating conductive hearing loss on the perception o f phonological and morphophonological /s/ and /z/ in young children. We pre dicted that children free of OME (OME-) would perform better than children with histories of OME (OME+). We also predicted that for the OME+ group mor phological perception would be harder than phonological perception because the former category carries an additional linguistic load (i.e., plurality) . Sixteen children, ages 26 to 28 months (M = 26.5, SD = 0.6) were divided into two groups, the OME- (n=8) and OME + (n=8) based on OME history during the first year of Life. Subjects in the OME- group were free of the diseas e for 4/5 visits and pure tone average (PTA) was 12.6 dB HL (SD=4.8). Subje cts in the OME+ group had the disease on 3/5 visits and PTA was 23 dB HT, ( SD=2.7). Experimental stimuli were six monosyllabic novel word-pairs. Membe rs of each word-pair differed only in the presence of final voiced or voice less fricative, marking the targets phonologically (e.g., [g superset of]/[ g superset ofs] as in 'law','loss') or morphophonologically (e.g., [daep]/[ daeps] as in 'map' 'maps'). Subjects were taught the unfamiliar word pairs using a fast mapping procedure. Perception was tested with the bimodal pref erential looking paradigm. Children in the OME- group performed significant ly better than their OME+ counterparts. Individual word-pair analyses showe d that OME+ group performed more poorly than the OME- group on one phonolog ical and on two morphological targets, all ending with [s]. For the OME+ gr oup, targets with final [s] posed greater difficulty than those with final [z], especially on morphophonological plural -{s) targets. The results sugg ested that the fluctuating hearing loss associated with OME might have a ne gative impact on speech perception.