Body mass index of 0 to 45-y-old Danes: reference values and comparison with published European reference values

Citation
K. Nysom et al., Body mass index of 0 to 45-y-old Danes: reference values and comparison with published European reference values, INT J OBES, 25(2), 2001, pp. 177-184
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
ISSN journal
03070565 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
177 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-0565(200102)25:2<177:BMIO0T>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To generate body mass index (weight/height(2) (kg/m(2)), BMI) r eference values for 0 to 45-y-old Danes and compare these with published Eu ropean reference values. SUBJECTS: A national sample used to generate the current Danish height and weight reference (29 106 measurements made 1965 - 1977; age 0 - 21 y; sampl e I), and four samples from Copenhagen (3391 measurements made 1981 - 1985; age 7 - 45 y; samples II-III and 2608 measurements made 1991 - 1994; age 6 - 45 y; samples IV-V). DATA ANALYSIS: Using the LMS method, Danish BMI reference values by age and sex were constructed from samples I and II. These were compared with BMI r eference values from Sweden (age 6 - 16 (girls) or 6 - 19 y (boys)), German y (6 - 19 y), UK (0 - 23 y), and France (0 - 87 y). Two recently examined b ut smaller Danish cohorts (samples IV and V) were compared with the referen ce values to assess the secular trend in BMI. RESULTS: Overall, Danish BMI reference values (samples I and II) fitted bes t with French reference values and were systematically below UK, Swedish an d German reference values. However, the BMI centiles of young adult Danish women were above French reference values and the BMI of Danes was substanti ally below French and UK reference values during the first months of life. The mean BMI Z-score of the recently examined samples was 0.24 (sample IV P = 0.0001) and 0.15 (sample V, P = 0.0001) based on the French reference va lues and 0.19 (sample IV, P = 0.0007) and 0.01 (sample V, P = 0.49) based o n the Danish reference values. CONCLUSION: For clinical purposes, we recommend comparing the BMI of Danish children and adolescents with the present Danish reference values and the new IOTF cut-off values and comparing the BMI of Danish adults with the WHO cut-off values. For research purposes, cut-off values and national or inte rnationally used BMI reference values may be used, depending on the researc h questions.