W. Landuyt et al., In vivo antitumor effect of vascular targeting combined with either ionizing radiation or anti-angiogenesis treatment, INT J RAD O, 49(2), 2001, pp. 443-450
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: Interference with the tumor blood vessels through anti-angiogenesi
s or vascular targeting can indirectly suppress tumor growth. Vascular targ
eting of solid tumors, using tubulin-compromising agents, seems a promising
and selective novel treatment. We aimed to evaluate the potential (hypothe
sis-based) benefit from combinations of vascular targeting using combretast
atin A-4 phosphate (combreAp) with either ionizing radiation or anti-angiog
enesis.
Methods and Materials: Rhabdomyosarcoma tumor pieces were inplanted subcuta
neously (s.c.) in the lower Rank region of syngeneic adult WAG/Rij rats, Tu
mors were groan until different sizes and stratified for the various treatm
ent groups: small (1-3 cm(3)), medium (3.1-7 cm(3)), and large (7.1-14 cm(3
)), CombreAp was injected i.p.; injections of TNP-470 were s.c. in the neck
area. Localized single-dose (8 Gy) irradiations of tumors were done under
Nembutal anesthesia, always 1 day before a single combreAp (25 mg/kg) injec
tion. The TNP-470 treatment (3 times 30 mg/kg in 1 week) started I day afte
r a double (8 days interval between both) combreAp administration. Tumor re
sponses were evaluated by the growth delay assay, and statistical significa
nce of tumor growth change was computed.
Results: Large tumors responded better to combreAp treatment given alone th
an did the smaller ones, confirming our previous data with this tumor model
. Combining irradiation with combreAp also resulted in a tumor size-depende
nt growth delay. With small and medium tumor volumes, a similar response wa
s measured after the combination treatment when compared with irradiation o
nly. Large tumors, however, showed a strong (at Least additive) increase of
the growth delay with the combined therapy; the difference in tumor growth
between the two treatment groups was very significant (p < 0.0001),
When TNP-470 was combined with combreAp, no significant lengthening of the
growth delay, irrespective of the tumor size, was present with the applied
schedule.
Conclusion: The current data show a significant advantage in the combinatio
n of combreAp with irradiation in rhabdomyosarcomas having a large size (7-
14 cm(3)) at treatment. Such a benefit in tumor response was not observed w
ith the smaller tumors, seemingly because irradiation as such was very effe
ctive. No significant gain in growth delay for any tumor size was observed
when TNP-470, showing efficacy on its own specifically with tumors measurin
g <7 cm(3), was added to the combreAp treatment. This presumably reflects o
nly little angiogenesis during the first week of rhabdomyosarcoma regrowth
after the combreAp treatment. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.