Well ... ah...: Hesitations and hedges as an influence on jurors' decisions

Citation
Na. Mendoza et al., Well ... ah...: Hesitations and hedges as an influence on jurors' decisions, J APPL SO P, 30(12), 2000, pp. 2610-2621
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219029 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2610 - 2621
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9029(200012)30:12<2610:W.AHAH>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Hispanic jurors' verdicts and whether these decisions were related to juror s' judgments of the credibility of the witness were the focus of this exper iment. A prosecution witness testified in English or in Spanish with interp retation in English. Witnesses' speaking style systematically included hedg es and hesitations or did not. Guilty verdicts were independent of language of testimony. Within Spanish-interpreted conditions, jurors convicted the defendant 47% of the time in the absence of hedges and hesitations. When he hedged and hesitated, they convicted 34% of the time. This effect was comp licated by a reliable Witness Hesitation x Juror Language Dominance interac tion. These results are interpreted in the context of the courtroom impact of non-English-speaking witnesses and the impact of interpretation.