The authors investigate the illusory correlation phenomenon as a possible c
ontributor to the persistence of graphology's use to predict personality. P
articipants unfamiliar with graphology inspected handwriting samples paired
with fabricated personality profiles. In Experiment 1, handwriting samples
and personality profiles were randomly paired. In Experiment 2, discernibl
e correlations near unity were set between targeted handwriting-feature-per
sonality-trait pairs in a congruent or incongruent direction with grapholog
ists' claims. In both experiments, participants' judgments of the correlati
on between designated handwriting-feature-personality-trait pairs agreed wi
th graphologists' claims, even after controlling for their actual statistic
al association. Semantic association between words used to describe handwri
ting features and personality traits was the source of biases in perceived
correlation. Results may partially account for continued use of graphology
despite overwhelming evidence against its predictive validity.