A. Foegen et al., Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers' beliefs about curriculum-based measurement, J SPEC EDUC, 34(4), 2001, pp. 226-236
in this study, we examined the beliefs of preservice teachers following the
ir viewing of one of two videotaped presentations on curriculum-based measu
rement (CBM). In one presentation, statistical information that supported C
BM's validity and utility was provided. In the second presentation, anecdot
al "first-person" accounts supporting CBM's utility and validity were provi
ded by a teacher who supposedly used CBM in her classroom. Following the vi
deotape, participants responded to a questionnaire addressing their beliefs
about CBM's utility and validity. Questions fell into five categories and
were asked from three different orientations. Results revealed no effects f
or presentation format (statistical or anecdotal), but an interaction betwe
en category and question orientation was noted. In general, participants' b
eliefs were more positive about the utility of CBM than about its validity.
This difference was most pronounced for student-oriented questions. Across
all question types, participants rated as least positive their beliefs abo
ut the validity of the number of words read in 1 minute as an indicator of
reading comprehension. Implications for practice are discussed.