Prognosis of renal amyloidosis: A clinicopathological study using cluster analysis

Citation
Y. Sasatomi et al., Prognosis of renal amyloidosis: A clinicopathological study using cluster analysis, NEPHRON, 87(1), 2001, pp. 42-49
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
NEPHRON
ISSN journal
00282766 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
42 - 49
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-2766(200101)87:1<42:PORAAC>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Progression of renal amyloidosis is associated with severe proteinuria or n ephrotic syndrome, and various mechanisms have been postulated to explain t hese complications. We studied the acceleration of proteinuria and reduced renal function by cluster analysis using clinical parameters, renal histolo gical findings, type of renal amyloidosis and follow-up data. We divided 97 cases into three groups of renal amyloidosis. Accelerated progression corr elated with serum creatinine (s-Cr) levels at renal biopsy and histological grade of renal damage by amyloid deposition (p < 0.0001). The most influen tial prognostic factors (s-Cr level <greater than or equal to>2.0 mg/dl) we re tubulointerstitial and vascular damage induced by amyloid deposition at biopsy (odds ratio 96.9 and 69.2, respectively). In addition, we found amyl oidosis type amyloid associated (AA) correlated with more amyloid-mediated vascular and tubulointerstitial damage than amyloidosis type amyloid light chain (AL) (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively). Proteinuria and nephrotic s yndrome were more severe in cases of amyloidosis AL than in amyloidosis AA (p = 0.076). In conclusion, less tubulointerstitial and vascular damage was caused by amyloid deposition; this was slowly progressive. Amyloid AA was detected in tubulointerstitial tissue and vessels more frequently than amyl oid AL. Heavy proteinuria and/or nephrosis were not indicators of rapid pro gression. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.