Ba. Chizh et al., Supraspinal vs spinal sites of the antinociceptive action of the subtype-selective NMDA antagonist ifenprodil, NEUROPHARM, 40(2), 2001, pp. 212-220
The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ifenprodil and several structura
lly related compounds are highly selective for the NR2B-containing receptor
subtype. This selectivity could provide an explanation for the reported di
fference of the analgesic and side-effect profile of ifenprodil-like compou
nds from other NMDA antagonists. In this work, we have queried if the ifenp
rodil-induced antinociception can be attributed to the block of NMDA recept
ors in the spinal cord. Ifenprodil and some other NMDA antagonists (MK-801,
memantine) were tested in a model of inflammatory pain (Randall-Selitto) i
n rats. The in vivo NMDA antagonism was assessed in anaesthetised rats on r
esponses of spinal dorsal horn (DH) neurones to iontophoretic NMDA and in t
he model of single motor unit (SMU) wind-up. Ifenprodil, MK-801 and memanti
ne dose-dependently increased nociceptive thresholds in the Randall-Selitto
model. Antinociceptive doses of the channel blockers selectively antagonis
ed NMDA responses of DH neurones and inhibited wind-up. In contrast, antino
ciceptive doses of ifenprodil did not show any NMDA antagonism in electroph
ysiological tests. Although ifenprodil did not inhibit the SMU responses to
noxious stimuli in spinalised rats, it markedly and dose-dependently inhib
ited nociceptive SMU responses in sham-spinalised rats. These results argue
against the spinal cord being the principal site of antinociceptive action
of ifenprodil; supraspinal structures seem to be involved in this effect.
(C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.