Does cryotherapy affect refractive error? Results from treated versus control eyes in the cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity trial

Citation
Ge. Quinn et al., Does cryotherapy affect refractive error? Results from treated versus control eyes in the cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity trial, OPHTHALMOL, 108(2), 2001, pp. 343-347
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
343 - 347
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(200102)108:2<343:DCARER>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of cryotherapy on refractive error status b etween ages 3 months and 10 years in children with birth weights of less th an 1251 g in whom severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) developed in one or both eyes during the neonatal period. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Participants: Two hundred ninety-one children in whom severe ROP developed during the neonatal period. Intervention: Cryotherapy for ROP. Main Outcome Measures: Cycloplegic Refraction Methods: The children underwent repeated follow-up eye examinations, includ ing cycloplegic retinoscopy, between 3 months and 10 years after term due d ate. Refractive error data from all eyes that were randomized to cryotherap y were compared with data from ail eyes that were randomized to serve as co ntrols. Refractive error data were also compared for a subset of children w ho had both a treated and a control eye that could be refracted. Results: At all ages, the proportion of treated eyes that were unable to be refracted because of retinal detachment, media opacity, or pupillary miosi s was approximately half the proportion of the control eyes that were unabl e to be refracted. When data from all eyes that could be refracted were con sidered, the distribution of refractive errors between fewer than 8 diopter s (D) of myopia and more than 8 D of hyperopia was similar for treated and control eyes at all ages. The proportion of eyes with 8 D or more of myopia was much higher in treated than in control eyes at all ages after 3 months . In the subset of children who had a treated eye and a control eye that co uld be refracted, distributions of refractive errors in treated versus cont rol eyes were similar at most ages. Conclusions: In both treated and control eyes, there was an increase in the prevalence of high myopia between 3 and 12 months of age. Between 12 month s and 10 years of age, there was little change in distribution of refractiv e error in treated or control eyes. The higher prevalence of myopia of 8 D or more in treated eyes, as compared with control eyes, may be the result o f cryotherapy's preservation of retinal structure in eyes that, in the abse nce of cryotherapy, would have progressed to retinal detachment. Ophthalmol ogy 2001;108:343-347 (C) 2001 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.