The role of lean body mass as a nutritional index in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients - Comparison of creatinine kinetics method and anthropometric method
Cc. Szeto et al., The role of lean body mass as a nutritional index in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients - Comparison of creatinine kinetics method and anthropometric method, PERIT DIA I, 20(6), 2000, pp. 708-714
Objective: To compare, in Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
(CAPD) patients, the creatinine kinetics method (LBM-CK) and the anthropom
etric method (LBM-AM) for determining lean body mass (LBM).
Design: Single-center cross-sectional study.
Patients and Methods: We studied 151 unselected CAPD patients (78 males, 73
females). We calculated LBM-CK and LBM-AM using standard formulas. The res
ults of the two methods were then compared by the Bland and Altman method.
Dialysis adequacy and other nutritional indices, including total Kt/V,weekl
y creatinine clearance (CCr), residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR), pr
otein nitrogen appearance (PNA), subjective global assessment (SGA), and se
rum albumin, were measured simultaneously.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.6 +/- 12.2 years, and the mean
duration of dialysis was 33.6 +/- 28.5 months. The mean body mass index (B
MI) was 22.7 +/- 3.7. The average LBM-AM was 43.6 +/- 8.0 kg; the average L
BM-CK was 33.0 +/- 9.3 kg. The difference between the calculated LBM-AM and
LBM-CK was 10.7 kg, with LBM-AM always giving a higher value; the limits o
f agreement were -5.8 kg and 27.1 kg. The difference between the two measur
es correlated with residual GFR (Pearson r = 0.629, p < 0.001). After norma
lizing for desired body weight, LBM-AM was only modestly correlated with se
rum albumin level. No correlations were found between overall SGA score or
normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA) and LBM-AM or LBM-CK.
Conclusions: In Chinese patients at least, a substantial discrepancy exists
between LBM-AM and LBM-CK. The difference is especially marked in patients
with significant residual renal function. The optimal method for determini
ng LBM remains obscure in Chinese CAPD patients. Moreover, LBM correlated p
oorly with other nutritional indices. Multiple parameters should be taken i
nto consideration in an assessment of nutritional status of CAPD patients.