J. Herlitz et al., Characteristics and outcome among patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest in monitored and non-monitored areas, RESUSCITAT, 48(2), 2001, pp. 125-135
Aim: To describe the characteristics and outcome among patients suffering i
n-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to whether the arrest took place in a
ward with monitoring facilities. Methods: All patients who suffered an in-
hospital cardiac arrest during a 4-year period in Sahlgrenska Hospital, Got
eborg, Sweden and in whom resuscitative efforts were attempted, were prospe
ctively recorded and described in terms of characteristics and outcome. Res
ults: Among 557 patients, 292 (53%) had a cardiac arrest in wards with moni
toring facilities. Those in a monitored location more frequently had a conf
irmed or possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as judged to be the cau
se of arrest (P < 0.0001), and the arrest was witnessed more frequently (96
vs. 79%; P < 0.0001). Ventricular fibrillation:tachycardia was observed mo
re often as initial arrhythmia in monitored wards (56 vs. 44%; P = 0.006).
The median interval between collapse and first defibrillation was 1 min in
monitored wards and 5 min in non-monitored wards (P < 0.0001). Among patien
ts with arrest in monitored wards 43.2% were discharged alive compared with
31.1% of patients in non-monitored wards (P = 0.004). Cerebral performance
category (CPC-score) at discharge was somewhat better among survivors in m
onitored wards. Conclusion: In a Swedish University Hospital 47% of in-hosp
ital cardiac arrests in which resuscitation was attempted took place in war
ds without monitoring facilities. These patients differed markedly from tho
se having arrest in wards with monitoring facilities in terms of characteri
stics, interval to defibrillation and outcome. A shortening of the interval
between collapse and defibrillation in these patients might increase survi
val even further. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserve
d.