Background: 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) and its prodrug azathioprine (AZA) have
proven efficacy in the treatment of Crohn disease (CD). The immunosuppress
ive properties of AZA/6-MP are mediated by the intracellular metabolism of
6-MP into its active metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) and 6-me
thylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). Preliminary studies have suggested that the red
blood cell concentration of 6TGN (RBC 6TGN) is a potential guide to therap
y. The aims of the study were to evaluate the RBC 6TGN concentrations in ad
ult patients with CD under long-term AZA/6-MP therapy and to correlate it w
ith response to treatment and haematological parameters. Methods: Twenty-ei
ght CD patients treated for at least 3 months with AZA/6-MP were prospectiv
ely studied. Patients were separated into three main groups: group 1 (n = 1
9), corresponding to quiescent CD receiving AZA (dose: 2.05 +/- 0.4 mg/kg/d
ay for a mean of 28.6 +/- 25 months) or 6-MP (dose: 1.4 +/- 01 mg/kg/day fo
r a mean of 7.5 +/- 3.5 months) alone; group 2 (n = 6), corresponding to qu
iescent CD treated by AZA (dose: 2.14 +/- 0.5 mg/kg/day for a mean of 29.5
+/- 22 months) with oral steroids; and group 3 (n = 3), corresponding to ac
tive CD on AZA (dose: 1.94 +/- 0.6 mg/kg/day for a mean of 31.3 +/- 35 mont
hs) as the only treatment. An assessment was also made by merging groups I
and 2 forming a larger group of patients (n = 25) defined by clinical remis
sion and groups 2 and 3 forming a larger group of patients (n=9), non-compl
ete responders with AZA/6-MP alone. Crohn disease index activity (CDAI), bl
ood samples for full blood count and differential white cell count and meas
urement of RBC 6TGN and 6-MMP concentrations were evaluated at inclusion an
d at 6 months (n = 17). RBC 6TGN were measured using high performance liqui
d chromatography (HPLC) on heparinized blood. Results: The baseline charact
eristics of the three groups of patients were similar. There was no signifi
cant difference among the three groups of patients regarding the dose and t
he duration of immunosuppressive treatment. There was no significant differ
ence between groups according to various parameters tested. Particularly, t
he median RBC 6TGN concentration at inclusion was similar in the three grou
ps of patients (166 (105-688), 183 (90-261) and 160 (52-194) pmol/8 x 10(8)
RBC, respectively). The majority of patients had no detectable level of 6-
MMP metabolite, except for 3 patients. There was also no difference between
merging groups. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between
RBC 6TGN concentrations and the various biological parameters tested except
for the mean erythrocyte volume. At 6 months, all patients of group 1 rema
ined in remission and median RBC 6TGN concentration remained stable. No sid
e effects were observed. Conclusions: There is, contrary to preliminary stu
dies, a broad overlap in RBC 6TGN levels as well as for haematological para
meters in patients in remission or not and responders or not to AZA/6-MP th
erapy. This suggests, beside a variability in the metabolism of these drugs
, the existence of complex mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, beside the u
se of RBC 6TGN determination to confirm compliance to therapy, this dosage
could be useful in non-responding patients, allowing, in absence of leukope
nia, to increase the dose of AZA/6-MP safely.