Predicting soil erosion in conservation tillage cotton production systems using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)

Citation
Ez. Nyakatawa et al., Predicting soil erosion in conservation tillage cotton production systems using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE), SOIL TILL R, 57(4), 2001, pp. 213-224
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
ISSN journal
01671987 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
213 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-1987(200101)57:4<213:PSEICT>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Despite being one of the most profitable crops for the southeastern USA, co tton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is considered to create a greater soil erosion hazard than other annual crops such as corn (Zen mays L.) and soybeans (Gl ycine max (L.) Merr.). Reduced tillage systems and cover cropping can reduc e soil erosion and leaching of nutrients into ground water. The objectives of this study, which was conducted in north Alabama from 1996 to 1998, were to assess the impact of no-till and mulch-till systems with a winter rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop and poultry litter on soil erosion estimates in cotton plots using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Soi l erosion estimates in conventional till plots with or without a winter rye cover crop and ammonium nitrate fertilizer were double the 11 t ha(-1) yr( -1) tolerance level for the Decatur series soils. However, using poultry li tter as the N source (100 kg N ha(-1)) gave soil erosion estimates about 50 % below the tolerance level under conventional till. Doubling the N rate th rough poultry litter to 200 kg N ha(-1) under no-till system gave the lowes t soil erosion estimate level. No-till and mulch-till gave erosion estimate s which were about 50% of the tolerance level with or without cover croppin g or N fertilization This study shows that no-till and mulch-till systems w ith cover cropping and poultry litter can reduce soil erosion in addition t o increasing cotton growth and lint yields, and thus improve sustainability of cotton soils in the southeastern USA. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Sc ience B.V.