Rc. Tsu et al., ROLE OF AMINO-TERMINAL AND CARBOXYL-TERMINAL REGIONS OF G(ALPHA-Z) INTHE RECOGNITION OF G(I)-COUPLED RECEPTORS, Molecular pharmacology, 52(1), 1997, pp. 38-45
Many G(i)-coupled receptors are known to interact with the pertussis t
oxin (PTX)-insensitive G(z) protein. Given that the alpha subunits of
G(i) and G(z) share only 60% identity in their amino acid sequences, t
heir receptor-interacting domains must be highly similar. By swapping
the carboxyl termini of alpha i2 and alpha z with each other or with t
hose of alpha t, alpha 12, and alpha 13, we examined the relative cont
ributions of the carboxyl-end 36 amino acids of the alpha chains towar
d receptor recognition. Chimeric alpha chains lacking the site for PTX
-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation were coexpressed with the type II adenylyl
cyclase (AC II) and one of several G(i)-coupled receptors (formyl pep
tide, dopamine D-2, and delta-opioid receptors) in human embryonic kid
ney 293 cells. The alpha i2/alpha z chimera was able to interact with
both aminergic and peptidergic receptors, resulting in beta gamma-medi
ated stimulation of AC II in the presence of agonists and PTX. Functio
nal and mutational analyses of alpha i2/alpha z revealed that this chi
mera can inhibit the endogenous ACs of 293 cells. Similarly, the alpha
z/alpha i2 chimera seemed to retain the abilities to interact with re
ceptors and inhibit cAMP accumulation. Fusion of the carboxyl-terminal
36 amino acids of alpha z to a backbone of alpha t1 produced a chimer
a, alpha t1/alpha z, that did not couple to any of the G(i)-coupled re
ceptors tested. Interestingly, an alpha 13/alpha z chimera (with only
the last five amino acids switched) displayed differential abilities t
o interact with receptors. Signals from aminergic, but not peptidergic
, receptors were transduced by alpha 13/alpha z. A similar construct,
alpha 12/ alpha z, behaved just like alpha 13/alpha z. These results i
ndicated that ''alpha i-like'' or ''alpha z-like'' sequences at the ca
rboxyl termini of alpha subunits are not always necessary or sufficien
t for specifying interaction with G(i)-coupled receptors.