A. Kassoff et al., The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataractsfrom photographs: AREDS report No. 4, AM J OPHTH, 131(2), 2001, pp. 167-175
PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in t
he Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken i
n a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical cen
ters, The photographs are evaluated by graders for quality and cataract sev
erity at a central reading center, The area of lens involvement is used to
assess the severity of cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities, Optica
l density of nuclear opacity is graded against a series of seven standard p
hotographs. Contemporaneous variability in grading is evaluated periodicall
y by having a second examiner regrade a subset of the photographs. Temporal
variability is assessed by annually regrading a subset of photographs.
RESULTS: Photographs of 925 eyes, most with no or early lens opacities, wer
e regraded to assess intergrader reliability. For cortical opacities, there
was an absolute difference of 10% or greater of area involved in 1.9% of t
he replicate gradings. For posterior subcapsular opacities an absolute diff
erence of 5% of area involved was noted in 2.8% of the regraded photographs
. For nuclear opacities, absolute differences of 1.5 or more steps were obs
erved in 0.6% of eyes. There was little evidence of temporal drift in gradi
ng any of the three types of opacity during four annual regrades.
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a high degree of reliability in grading t
he severity of lens opacities in a large study cohort with mostly early len
s changes, the type of cohort most likely to be entered in clinical trials
involving cataract prevention. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for
Classifying Cataracts From Photographs could be useful in studies where th
ere is a need to standardize data collection over time and across different
data collection sites. Limitations of the system include the cost of imple
mentation and, currently, the limited amount of data on grading reproducibi
lity for more advanced lens opacities. (Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:167-175. (
C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved).