Objective: To determine the optimal electromyography screening examination
of the upper limb that ensures detection of those cervical radiculopathies,
which can be electrodiagnostically confirmed, yet minimizes the number of
muscles studied.
Design: A prospective multicenter study was conducted from May 1996 to Sept
ember 1997 at five institutions. Patients who were referred to participatin
g electrodiagnostic laboratories with suspected cervical radiculopathy were
recruited. A standard set of muscles were examined by needle electromyogra
phy. Patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed cervical radiculopathies
, based on electromyography findings, were selected for analysis. Muscle sc
reens were tested against this group to determine whether the screen identi
fied the patients with radiculopathy.
Results: There were 101 patients with cervical radiculopathies representing
ail cervical root levels. When paraspinal muscles were one of the screenin
g muscles, five muscle screens identified 90% to 98% of radiculopathies, si
x muscle screens identified 94% to 99%, and seven muscle screens identified
96% to 100%. When paraspinal muscles were not part of the screen, eight di
stal limb muscles recognized 92% to 95% of radiculopathies.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that six muscle screens including paras
pinal muscles yielded consistently high identification rates. Studying addi
tional muscles led to marginal increases in identification.