To determine whether less-invasive saphenous vein harvest reduces morbidity
in patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass, we retrospectively compared 6
1 patients undergoing endoscopic harvest (ENDO) with 49 patients undergoing
conventional harvest (OPEN) over the past 13 months. Patients were classif
ied as potential short-stay if adjunctive suprainguinal inflow procedures o
r foot amputations were not required and the patient was ambulatory prior t
o elective operation. Mean endoscopic harvest time was 50 +/- 18 (range 25-
90) min, and no more than three 5-cm incisions were required in 87% of case
s. Szilagyi class II or III wound complications occurred after 1 of the 61
(2%) ENDO procedures and 7 of the 49 (14%) OPEN (p < 0.01), and any complic
ation occurred in 13 (21%) vs. 25 (51%) of ENDO and OPEN procedures, respec
tively (p < 0.002). Mean postoperative length of stay was significantly sho
rter in the 24 short-stay ENDO (4.0 +/- 2.4 days) vs. 25 short-stay OPEN (6
.0 +/- 3.2 days) patients (p < 0.02). Thirty-day patency rates between the
two groups were not different. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest is associa
ted with a reduced incidence of serious wound complications and, in selecte
d patients, shortened postoperative hospital stay.