Study objective: To evaluate a newly developed laser monitor in the me
asurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced changes i
n end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in spontaneously breathing subject
s. Design: An open comparison between two different methods to assess
breathing parameters. Setting: A respiratory research unit. Participan
ts: Six spontaneously breathing, healthy volunteers. Interventions: St
epwise increases of PEEP from 0 to 0.8 to 1.6 kPa during spontaneous b
reathing; repeated validation of the laser monitor in each subject. Me
asurements and results: Pressure and flow were recorded at the airway
opening, Abdominal wall displacement (AWD) measured by the laser senso
r was recorded simultaneously, The time lag between the volume and the
laser signals during baseline was 0.068+/-0.052 s and during maximal
PEEP, 0.108+/-0.093 s, There was no baseline drift in either the PEEP
or the AWD signals. Mean EELV decreased by 290 mL to 1,157 mL after th
e PEEP valve was removed. Within each individual, the ratio between EE
LV and AWD showed only small variations. Measurements of tidal volume
(VT) and AWD showed good agreement at all PEEP levels. Mean VT decreas
ed in all but one subject during PEEP. With the increase in PEEP, the
end-expiratory abdominal baseline increased linearly over a large rang
e of end-expiratory pressures with a flattening of the curve at high P
EEP levels in all subjects. Conclusions: The laser monitor is sufficie
ntly accurate for measuring PEEP-induced changes in EELV during sponta
neous breathing in healthy adult subjects, Monitors incorporating mult
iple laser sensors may have considerable clinical promise.