D. Blom et Si. Schwartz, Surgical treatment and outcomes in carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts - The University of Rochester experience, ARCH SURG, 136(2), 2001, pp. 209-214
Hypothesis: To our knowledge, few individual surgeons and only a handful of
institutions have gained a meaningful experience with the treatment of ade
nocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts or cholangiocarcinoma. The purpo
se of this study was to critically evaluate the experience of a single cent
er in the treatment of these tumors.
Design: Retrospective cohort study with a median follow-up of 48 months.
Setting: Department of surgery at a university referral center.
Patients: Seventy-seven patients with biopsyconfirmed adenocarcinoma of the
extrahepatic bile ducts evaluated and treated between January 1980 and Feb
ruary 1998.
Main Outcome Measures: Prognostic variables, resectability rates, morbidity
, and survival.
Results: Thirty-eight male and 39 female patients were studied (median age,
71 years). Twenty-three patients (30%) underwent curative resections, 32 p
atients (41%) underwent palliative surgery, and 22 patients (29%) received
nonoperative therapies. The 30-day perioperative morbidity rate was 18%, an
d mortality was 6%. Overall median survival was II months; 4 months for pat
ients receiving nonoperative therapy; 8 months for patients recieving palli
ative surgery; and 72 months for curative resection. Five-year survival rat
es were 23%, 0% 10%, and 55%, respectively. Curative resection was the only
prognostic variable to have a statistically significant effect on survival
.
Conclusions: Curative resection could be achieved in approximately one thir
d of patients who had cholangiocarcinoma, and should be the goal of treatme
nt. Survival is significantly improved in those patients who are considered
to have resectable tumors and who undergo removal of all gross disease. Pa
lliative surgical treatments also revealed a survival advantage over nonope
rative therapies.