J. Andrade et al., Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation, BR J ANAEST, 86(2), 2001, pp. 189-195
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Doubt remains about the conditions under which learning persists despite an
aesthesia. This study investigated the relative importance of dose of anaes
thetic and stimulation for learning during propofol infusion before surgery
. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Group 1 recei
ved two word lists (category examples and nonsense words) during infusion o
f propofol to a target concentration of 2 mug ml(-1). Groups 2 and 3 receiv
ed the word lists during infusion of propofol 5 mug ml(-1). Group 2 receive
d nonsense words before tracheal intubation and category examples during in
tubation; Group 3 heard category examples before and nonsense words during
intubation. Bispearal index was recorded as a measure of depth of sedation/
anaesthesia. We assessed explicit memory on recovery using a structured int
erview and a recognition test. We assessed implicit memory using a category
generation test and a preference rating task. To establish baseline, a con
trol group of 12 patients completed the category generation test without re
ceiving the category examples during anaesthesia. Overall, there was no evi
dence for learning during propofol infusion, though the category generation
task showed a trend towards more implicit memory for words presented durin
g intubation than during anaesthesia. We conclude that learning does not oc
cur during anaesthesia without surgery.