Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation

Citation
J. Andrade et al., Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation, BR J ANAEST, 86(2), 2001, pp. 189-195
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00070912 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
189 - 195
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(200102)86:2<189:CTEOSA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Doubt remains about the conditions under which learning persists despite an aesthesia. This study investigated the relative importance of dose of anaes thetic and stimulation for learning during propofol infusion before surgery . Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Group 1 recei ved two word lists (category examples and nonsense words) during infusion o f propofol to a target concentration of 2 mug ml(-1). Groups 2 and 3 receiv ed the word lists during infusion of propofol 5 mug ml(-1). Group 2 receive d nonsense words before tracheal intubation and category examples during in tubation; Group 3 heard category examples before and nonsense words during intubation. Bispearal index was recorded as a measure of depth of sedation/ anaesthesia. We assessed explicit memory on recovery using a structured int erview and a recognition test. We assessed implicit memory using a category generation test and a preference rating task. To establish baseline, a con trol group of 12 patients completed the category generation test without re ceiving the category examples during anaesthesia. Overall, there was no evi dence for learning during propofol infusion, though the category generation task showed a trend towards more implicit memory for words presented durin g intubation than during anaesthesia. We conclude that learning does not oc cur during anaesthesia without surgery.