P. Garzon et Mj. Eisenberg, Functional testing for the detection of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A meta-analysis, CAN J CARD, 17(1), 2001, pp. 41-48
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have examined the ability of functional tes
ting to detect restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angiopla
sty (PTCA). However, a metaanalysis of these studies has not been performed
.
OBJECTIVES: To pool the results of studies examining the diagnostic abiliti
es of exercise treadmill testing (ETT), stress nuclear imaging and stress e
chocardiographic imaging at six months to detect post-PTCA restenosis. The
secondary objective was to examine, through the use of a theoretical model,
the impact of stenting on the yield of post-PTCA functional testing.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies ex
amining post-PTCA functional testing for the diagnosis of restenosis. The E
nglish language literature was examined for the years 1975 to 2000. Appropr
iate articles were identified, and their references were examined to identi
fy additional studies. The sensitivities and specificities of these studies
were then pooled and Bayes' theorem was used to examine the effect of sten
ting on the diagnostic abilities of post-PTCA functional resting.
RESULTS: A pooled analysis showed that ETT alone has a poor sensitivity (46
%, 95% CI 33% to 58%) and a moderate specificity (77%, 95% CI 67% to 86%) f
or the identification of post-PTCA restenosis. The use of nuclear imaging i
ncreases the sensitivity (87%, 95% CI 74% to 100%) and the specificity (78%
, 95% CI 74% to 81%). Echocardiographic imaging also increases both sensiti
vity (63%, 95% CI 15% to 100%) and specificity (87%, 95% CI 72% to 100%), T
he positive likelihood ratios for ETT alone, nuclear imaging and echocardio
graphic imaging were calculated to be 1.94, 3.93 and 4.94, respectively. Co
nversely, the negative likelihood ratios were calculated to be 0.71, 0.16 a
nd 0.43, respectively. As restenosis rates decline from 30% to 10%, the fal
se positive rare of stress imaging increases from 37% to 77%.
CONCLUSIONS: ETT alone is poorly diagnostic of post-PTCA restenosis, while
stress nuclear and stress echocardiographic imaging perform better. However
, the value of routine post PTCA functional testing to detect restenosis is
declining because restenosis rates are decreasing.