Aerosolized iloprost therapy could not replace long-term IV epoprostenol (prostacyclin) administration in severe pulmonary hypertension

Objectives: To switch patients with severe pulmonary hypertension and previ ous life-threatening catheter-related complications from long-term IV epopr ostenol therapy to aerosolized iloprost therapy. Design: Open, uncontrolled trial. Setting: Medical ICU of a university hospital. Patients: Two patients with primary pulmonary hypertension and one patient with pulmonary hypertension after surgical closure of atrial septal defect (mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg). All wer e classified as New York Heart Association class II under treatment with co ntinuous TV epoprostenol for 4 years. Interventions: Stepwise reduction of IV epoprostenol (1 ng/kg/min steps eve ry 3 to 10 h) during repeated inhalations of aerosolized iloprost (150 to 3 00 mug/d with 6 to 18 inhalations/d). Continuous pulmonary and systemic art erial monitoring were performed. Results: Aerosolized iloprost reduced pulmonary artery pressure by 49%, 49% , and 45%, respectively, and increased cardiac output by 70%, 75%, and 41% in the three patients. The effect lasted for 20 min and was similar at diff erent doses of IV epoprostenol. Persistent treatment change to inhaled ilop rost could not be achieved because all patients developed signs of right he art failure. After termination of iloprost inhalations, return to standard epoprostenol therapy led to clinical and hemodynamic restoration. Conclusions: Although aerosolized iloprost demonstrated short-term hemodyna mic effects, it could not be utilized as alternative chronic vasodilator in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension.