Body proportions during 6 years of GH treatment in children with short stature born small for gestational age participating in a randomised, double-blind, dose-response trial
Tcj. Sas et al., Body proportions during 6 years of GH treatment in children with short stature born small for gestational age participating in a randomised, double-blind, dose-response trial, CLIN ENDOCR, 53(6), 2000, pp. 675-681
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess body proportions in children
with short stature born small for gestational age (SGA) before and during 6
years of growth hormone (GH) treatment.
DESIGN A prospective randomised double-blind dose-response study comparing
the effects of 3 vs. 6 IU GH/m(2)/day.
PATIENTS Seventy-nine children with short stature (height SD-score < -1.88)
born small for gestational age (birth length SD-score < -1.88).
MEASUREMENTS Before and during GH treatment, height, sitting height (SH), h
and (Hand) and foot length (Foot), biacromial (Biac) and biiliacal diameter
(Biil) were measured. All results were adjusted for age and sex, and expre
ssed as SD-scores (SDS) using reference values for healthy Dutch children.
To describe the size of SH, Hand, Foot, Biac, and Biil in relation to heigh
t, these values were adjusted for the SDS of height.
RESULTS At baseline, these short children had small hands and feet and narr
ow shoulders and pelvis compared to healthy peers, Height and SH, were, how
ever, even more affected. Consequently, on average, these children had rela
tively large hands and feet, and relatively broad shoulders and pelvis comp
ared to their height, but a normal sitting height in proportion to height.
In most of the individuals, the values for body proportions were, however,
within the normal range. During 6 years of GH treatment the SD-scores of al
l measurements increased significantly towards values more close to zero. T
he mean size of Hand, Foot, and Biil decreased in proportion to height. The
mean SH increased relatively more than height, however, to values well wit
hin the normal range. The mean Biac in relation to height had not changed a
fter 6 years of GH treatment. No differences in the 6-year changes in body
proportions were found between the two GH dosage groups.
CONCLUSIONS Untreated short children born small for gestational age have, o
n average, relatively large hands and feet, and broad shoulders and pelvis,
but a normal sitting height compared to height. The increase in height dur
ing 6 years of GH treatment is accompanied by an improvement of the proport
ions of the size of hands, feet, and biiliacal diameter, in relation to hei
ght. The increase in height appeared to be the result of the increase in si
tting height as well as leg length, but the sitting height SD-score increas
ed slightly more than that of leg length. The changes in body proportion du
ring GH treatment were dose-independent. Thus, 6-year continuous GH treatme
nt with either 3 or 6 IU/m(2)/day in children with short stature born small
for gestational age does not negatively influence body proportions.