Mele's study of philosophical and psychological theories of self-decep
tion informatively links the conceptual and dynamic aspects of self-de
ception and explicates it without positing mutually inconsistent belie
fs, such as those occurring in two-person deception. It is argued, how
ever, that he does not do full justice to the dissociation characteris
tic of self-deception and does not sufficiently distinguish self-decep
tion from self-caused deception.