This article reports the findings into patterns of governance on nonprofit
boards in Australia. The research surveys 118 boards, upon which serve a to
tal of 1405 directors.
The findings indicate that nonprofit boards can mimic some aspects of a sha
reholder approach to governance. But nonprofit boards, in the main, indicat
e priorities and activities of a stakeholder approach to governance. The fe
atures of 'isomorphism' that arise largely stem from legislative requiremen
ts in corporate governance. Generally, nonprofit directors are influenced b
y agenda and motivations that can be differentiated from the influences upo
n director activity in the corporate sector.
The study indicates that nonprofit boards prize knowledge and loyalty to th
e sector when considering board composition. The survey suggests nonprofits
"compensate" for the demands placed upon them about fiduciary duty and due
diligence responsibilities with the diverse intellectual expertise of non-
executive directors. Nonprofit boards possess greater diversity than boards
in the corporate sector; they include more women as directors than corpora
te boards and they include a greater proportion of directors from minority
groups. While strategic issues feature significantly as a task of the nonpr
ofit board, they distinguish themselves from their corporate counterparts b
y engaging in operational management.
The findings indicate that, in the main, directors on nonprofit boards deli
berate and operate in ways distinctive from their corporate counterparts. S
uch findings offer a contribution to the reform of Corporations Law in othe
r countries and the likely consequence on boards outside the corporate sect
or.