Social psychologists have usually hypothesized that attitudinal selectivity
biases people's memory in favor of information that is congenial to their
attitudes, because they are motivated to defend their attitudes against unc
ongenial information. However, our meta-analysis found that such effects ha
ve been only inconsistently obtained. One reason for these inconsistencies
is that the defense of attitudes against attacks does not necessarily entai
l avoiding the uncongenial information. As shown by our experiments, people
often expose themselves to attitudinally uncongenial information, attend t
o it, scrutinize it carefully, encode it accurately, and remember it fairly
well, even though they dislike the information and are not persuaded by it
. Given sufficient motivation and capacity, people mount an active defense
that enhances memory for the information.