Effect of treatment with acarbose and insulin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus associated with non-alcoholic liver cirrhosis

Citation
S. Gentile et al., Effect of treatment with acarbose and insulin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus associated with non-alcoholic liver cirrhosis, DIABET OB M, 3(1), 2001, pp. 33-40
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
ISSN journal
14628902 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
33 - 40
Database
ISI
SICI code
1462-8902(200101)3:1<33:EOTWAA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Aim: Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes) not respondi ng to dietary treatment alone in patients with non-alcoholic liver cirrhosi s is characterized by high postprandial hyperglycaemia. The control of post prandial hyperglycaemia in such patients, is generally achieved by the mean s of progressively higher doses of insulin, with an increasing risk of hypo glycaemia in the late postprandial period. The aim of this study was to eva luate the use of acarbose for the control of postprandial hyperglycaemia in 100 patients with well-compensated liver cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes tre ated with insulin. Methods: The study was double blind with randomization of treatments into a carbose (52 patients) vs. placebo (48 patients) with parallel branches over a period of 28 weeks. Results: All patients tolerated the treatments well and no significant vari ations in liver function tests were observed (< 5% vs. pretreatment). A sig nificant reduction of several parameters was observed only after acarbose t reatment: fasting glycaemia (173 +/- 28 vs. 146 +/- 19 mg/dl; p < 0.01), po stprandial glycaemia (230 +/- 24 vs. 148 +/- 20 mg/dl; p < 0.01), mean glyc aemia (206 +/- 20 vs. 136 +/- 13 mg/dl; p < 0.01), mean variation (180 +/- 14 vs. 51 +/- 10 mg/dl; p < 0.01), HbA(1c) (8.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.5; p < 0.05), C-peptide 2 h after a standard meal (4.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 2.8 +/- 1.7 n g/ml; p < 0.05), whereas the parameters did not change significantly after the placebo. After acarbose treatment a significant increase of intestinal voiding/week (+ 116% vs. + 10%; p < 0.01) and a parallel reduction of blood ammonia levels (- 52 +/- 9% vs. - 9 +/- 5%; P < 0.01) were observed. Conclusions: The results clearly document the good tolerability and the abs ence of toxic effects of acarbose on liver, due to the lack of both intesti nal absorption and hepatic metabolism of the drug at doses in the therapeut ic range. In fact, acarbose increases the peristalsis movements of the gut, stimulates the proliferation of the saccarolytic bacteria and simultaneous ly reduces the proliferation of proteolytic bacteria, thus resulting active in the reduction of blood ammonia levels. These effects of acarbose may be advantageously exploited in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with well-compensated non-alcholic liver cirrhosis.