Rainfall-contingent detection of fire impacts: Responses of beetles to experimental fire regimes

Citation
Kr. Blanche et al., Rainfall-contingent detection of fire impacts: Responses of beetles to experimental fire regimes, ECOL APPL, 11(1), 2001, pp. 86-96
Citations number
77
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
ISSN journal
10510761 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
86 - 96
Database
ISI
SICI code
1051-0761(200102)11:1<86:RDOFIR>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Fire is a valuable tool for maintaining biodiversity in many ecosystems thr oughout the world, particularly tropical savannas. An understanding of the impact of different fire management regimes is essential if desired outcome s are to be achieved. Numerous studies have shown patchy and inconsistent r esponses of insects to fire. This may be because detection of responses to fire was contingent upon environmental conditions such as rainfall. Here we examine how ground-active beetles respond to savanna fires and how detecti on of these responses is contingent upon the amount of rain occurring prior to sampling. We also test the extent to which family-level responses are " taxonomically sufficient" to reveal responses detected at the species level . Our study was part of a landscape-scale, replicated field experiment at Kap alga Research Station, Kakadu National Park, in the wet-dry tropics of nort hern Australia. Over a 7-yr period (1988-1994), ground-active beetles were monitored using pitfall traps. In 1988 and 1989 fires were excluded from al l of the 15-20-km(2) experimental compartments. From 1990 to 1994, three ex perimental fire regimes were applied: burning annually early in the dry sea son (May/June), burning annually toward the end of the dry season (Septembe r/October), and exclusion of fire. Each treatment was replicated three time s. Pitfall trapping began at the start of the wet season in 1988 and contin ued twice a year, in the middle of the dry season (July/August) and early i n the wet season (November/December), until the conclusion of the study at the end of 1994. Beetle abundance in dry-season samples was too low and variable for any mea ningful statistical analyses. For wet-season samples, repeated-measures ana lysis of variance revealed that fires late in the dry season significantly reduced the number of ground-active beetle individuals, families, and speci es. However, detecting this decline was contingent upon substantial amounts of rain falling prior to sampling. In addition, canonical correspondence a nalysis (CCA) showed that fire intensity and amount of rainfall prior to sa mpling interacted to change abundance of several common beetle families and species. Fires late in the dry season appeared to disadvantage some common wet-adapted taxa, while favoring other common groups that were dry-adapted . A Mantel test, comparing dissimilarity matrices based on abundances of co mmon families and species, confirmed that analysis at the family level was taxonomically sufficient to reveal most responses found by analysis at the species level. The strong influence of rainfall on detection of beetle responses to fire p oses a challenge to managers using such insects to monitor fire-prone ecosy stems. Unless monitoring strategies include rainfall in the sampling design , burning prescriptions may not appear to produce desired or consistent out comes; fire impacts may be there, but go undetected.