Ag. Mainous et Jm. Gill, The lack of screening for diabetic nephropathy: Evidence from a privately insured population, FAM MED, 33(2), 2001, pp. 115-119
Background: We examined the performance of screening tests for diabetic nep
hropathy in a population of privately insured individuals. Methods: Adminis
trative data from a large private health plan were analyzed. Continuously i
nsured persons with diabetes (ages 30-62) with greater than or equal to one
office visit during the study year (July 1995 to June 1996) were included
(n=4,758). Outcome variables included a urinalysis for protein and a test f
or microalbuminuria. The likelihood of test performance according to age, g
ender; insurance plan type, total office visits, diabetes office visits, an
d specialty of predominant physician was examined both in bivariate analyse
s and a logistic regression. Results: Among the 4,623 patients without evid
ence of nephropathy, only 16.5% had a urinalysis test conducted sometime in
the year: All individuals (2.1% of sample) who received a microalbuminuria
test also received a urinalysis. Individuals with indemnity or PPO plans w
ere more likely to be screened than individuals in point-of-service plans.
Patients with more visits and more diabetes visits were more likely to be s
creened. In the regression with family practice as the reference category,
general internists were the only physician specialty more likely to have sc
reened patients. Conclusions: The majority of patients with diabetes mellit
us do not receive annual screening for microalbuminuria or urinary protein.