M. Burgi et al., Effects of postsettlement human activities on forest composition in the north-eastern United States: a comparative approach, J BIOGEOGR, 27(5), 2000, pp. 1123-1138
Aim This study compares human impacts and forest ecosystem response across
geographical regions. Such a comparison allows us to evaluate the relations
hip between regional changes in forest composition and regional patterns of
human activity.
Location Four study areas in the north-eastern USA were investigated, two o
f which were dominated by oak-pine forests at the time of European settleme
nt (Central Massachusetts, MA; Pike County, PA), and two of which were domi
nated by beech and hemlock (South Berkshire, MA; Wayne County, PA).
Methods Trees recorded in early land survey records were compiled and compa
red with data on modern forest composition obtained from recent forest inve
ntories. To assess the similarity of the four regions with regard to specie
s composition, Euclidean Distances (ED) were calculated between the colonia
l and modern forest composition for each of the four regions. Information a
bout the history of human impacts in the four study regions was used to int
erpret the changes in forest composition.
Results General changes in forest composition through the historical period
include a decline in beech, hemlock and chestnut, and an increase in maple
and birch. Changes in pine and oak were minor by comparison. Supraregional
human impacts are generally linked with supraregional trends in species co
mposition, whereas regional patterns of land use caused regional patterns o
f change in species composition.
Main conclusions These results suggest that human activities do not necessa
rily lead to more similar species composition between regions, especially i
f these activities show clear spatial patterns at about the same resolution
that species composition is evaluated. Comparing species-specific changes
in forest composition with species-specific human activities on the same sp
atial scale is crucial in order to evaluate human impacts on ecosystems and
to make more robust generalizations about the temporal dynamics of landsca
pes.