Comparison of various sample preparation methods for PCR diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis using peripheral blood

Citation
L. Lachaud et al., Comparison of various sample preparation methods for PCR diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis using peripheral blood, J CLIN MICR, 39(2), 2001, pp. 613-617
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
613 - 617
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200102)39:2<613:COVSPM>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
We have compared various sample preparation methods for the PCR diagnosis o f visceral leishmaniasis (VL) using peripheral blood samples and tested the influence of these protocols upon sensitivity. Four methods of lysis-DNA e xtraction were used with two types of blood samples: whole blood (WB) and b uffy coat (BC). Comparisons were first carried out with seeded samples at v arious parasite concentrations. lit high concentrations (greater than or eq ual to1,000 parasites/ml), there were no significant differences in PCR sen sitivity among the methods tested. At concentrations of less than or equal to 100 parasites/ml, proteinase K (PK)-based methods proved clearly superio r to guanidine-EDTA-based methods. Moreover, a 10-fold increase in sensitiv ity was observed for BC over that for WE. Thus, the best sensitivity was ob tained with the BC prepared,vith PK-based methods. With this combination, t he PCR reliably detected 10 parasites/ml but was inconsistent when the samp le contained 1 para site/ml of blood. The methods that yielded the highest sensitivities were evaluated with seven dogs and four human VL patients. Ag ain, the utilization of the BC prepared with PK-based methods gave the best results. The optimization of each step of the assay (sample preparation, D NA extraction, and PCR conditions) yielded a highly sensitive tool for the diagnosis of VL using patient blood, thus avoiding more invasive diagnostic procedures and allowing the detection of low parasitemia during posttherap eutic follow-up.