Mj. Rosen et F. Li, The adsorption of gemini and conventional surfactants onto some soil solids and the removal of 2-naphthol by the soil surfaces, J COLL I SC, 234(2), 2001, pp. 418-424
The adsorption of two cationic gemini surfactants, [CnH2n+1 N+(CH3)(2)-CH2C
H2](2). 2Br(-), where n=12 and 14, on limestone, sand, and clay (Na-montmor
illonite) from their aqueous solution in double-distilled water and the eff
ect of this adsorption on the removal of 2-naphthol have been studied. Comp
ared to those of conventional cationic surfactants with similar single hydr
ophilic and hydrophobic groups (CnH2n+1N+(CH3)(3). Br-, where n=12 and 14),
the molar adsorptions of the gemini and the conventional surfactants on Na
-montmorillonite are almost identical and very close to their cation exchan
ge capacities. On sand and limestone, the molar adsorption of the cationic
gemini surfactants is much larger than that of their corresponding conventi
onal surfactants. Adsorption studies of the pollutants onto the three kinds
of solids treated by either the gemini or the conventional surfactants sho
w that the former are both more efficient and more effective at removing 2-
naphthol from the aqueous phase. On all three soil solids, the addition of
KBr increases the efficiency of the adsorption of both types of cationics a
nd for most cases increases also the maximum amount adsorbed, but decreases
slightly the efficiency of removal of 2-naphthol. On limestone, the anioni
c gemini adsorbs with one hydrophilic group oriented toward the Ca2+ sites
on the surface and its second hydrophilic group oriented toward the aqueous
phase. The conventional anionic surfactant forms a double layer. The gemin
i anionic is more efficient and more effective than the conventional anioni
c in the removal of 2-naphathol from the aqueous phase. Both anionic conven
tional and gemini surfactants have no adsorption on sand. The adsorption me
chanisms for all the surfactants on the three soil solid surfaces are discu
ssed. (C) 2001 Academic Press.