Carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy

Citation
G. Dangas et al., Carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy, J ENDOVAS T, 8(1), 2001, pp. 39-43
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY
ISSN journal
15266028 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
39 - 43
Database
ISI
SICI code
1526-6028(200102)8:1<39:CASIPW>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Purpose: To report the results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients considered to have high-risk anatomical characteristics for carotid endart erectomy. Methods: CAS was performed in 39 carotid arteries of 37 consecutive patient s (26 men; mean age 72 +/- 8 years, range 56-88) who met the criteria for h igh-risk surgical anatomy: previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (20/ 39, 51.3%), common carotid bifurcation above the mandibular angle (5/39, 12 .8%), contralateral carotid artery occlusion (15/39, 38.5%), or previous ra diation therapy to the neck (1/39, 2.6%). Palmaz, Integra, or Wallstents we re deployed via a percutaneous femoral artery access. Independent neurologi cal evaluation was performed at specified time points, and a dedicated comm ittee adjudicated all clinical events. Results: Procedural success was 100%, with no major in-hospital complicatio ns. Neurological events were rare. Only 1 (2.6%) transient ischemic attack occurred prior to discharge; at 30 days, 1 (2.6%) additional minor stroke h ad been observed, giving a 2.6% cumulative 30-day "death plus any stroke" r ate. Over a mean 11 +/- 6-month follow-up, 2 (5.4%) patients died of nonneu rological causes, but there were no strokes. Conclusions: CAS is a viable endovascular revascularization technique that can be performed safely and effectively in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy.