Here, Lawless seeks to explain in more detail her use of the term "reciproc
al ethnography" and to address possible misinterpretations of it. She sugge
sts the potential usefulness of such a concept and also proposes "a modifie
d approach through which Pat Mullen and Jesse Truvillion can, in future wor
k, move more deeply into the issues of ethics, responsibility, narrative co
nstructions, truth, and meaning." By asking a series of specific questions,
she challenges the two men to probe further some of the issues that emerge
from their writings.