Historical reviews of the field of non-Mendelian genetics and many other pu
blications credit Erwin Baur and Carl Correns equally for the development o
f the theory of plastid inheritance. However, a study of the original liter
ature indicates that this conclusion is not correct. Analysis of the releva
nt articles leads to the conclusion that Baur alone deserves credit for the
theory of plastid inheritance, In his classic article on the inheritance p
roperties of white-margined Pelargonium plants, Baur (1909) stated: (1) The
plastids are carriers of hereditary factors which are able to mutate. (2)
In variegated plants, random sorting-out of plastids is taking place, (3) T
he genetic results indicate a biparental inheritance of plastids by egg cel
ls and sperm cells in Pelargonium. By contrast, Correns held the view that
in variegated plants there is a maternally transmitted labile state of the
cytoplasm which switches either to a permanently "healthy" state (allowing
the "indifferent" plastids to become green chloroplasts) or to a permanentl
y "diseased, ill" cytoplasmic state (causing white plastids and cells). Ott
o Renner supported Baur's theory and worked out important characteristics o
f plastid inheritance in the genus Oenothera. In the 1930s Renner reported
many more observations, which established plastid inheritance as a widely a
ccepted genetic theory.