Pulmonary metastasectomy: Might the type of resection affect survival?

Citation
Tc. Mineo et al., Pulmonary metastasectomy: Might the type of resection affect survival?, J SURG ONC, 76(1), 2001, pp. 47-52
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
00224790 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
47 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4790(200101)76:1<47:PMMTTO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Metastasectomy proved to be the choice treatment in the case of pulmonary metastasis. In this study we assessed the impact on survival of three types of resection: minimal by laser or conventional d evice and lobectomy. Methods: We considered 85 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for tu mors that originated from various sites. Fifty-two minimal resections were accomplished in 34 patients by conventional (diathermy dissection or staple r suture line) device, 59 resections in 29 by Nd:YAG laser. Lobectomies wer e 22, Minimum follow up required was 2 years. Results: The 3-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 63%, 44%, 53% for laser, conventional resections and lobectomy. The 5-year survival was 40%, 28%, 2 6% respectively. Among the groups there was no significant difference (P = 0.15). Laser patients showed shorter periods of air leakage and hospital st ay. Conclusions: The type of resection did not disclose statistically significa nt differences on survival. Minimal surgery, especially by laser device, is recommended for less morbidity. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001;76:47-52. (C) 2001 Wi ley-Liss, Inc.