A. Gonzalezkoch et al., THE COMBINATION OF URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID AND METHOTREXATE FOR PRIMARY BILIARY-CIRRHOSIS IS NOT BETTER THAN URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID ALONE, Journal of hepatology, 27(1), 1997, pp. 143-149
Backgrourd/Aims: Many therapies have been tried in primary biliary cir
rhosis, It has been suggested that a combination of ursodeoxycholic ac
id and methotrexate may offer advantages, Because the benefit and safe
ty of this combination is uncertain, we conducted this prospective, ra
ndomized, double-blind, controlled trial, Methods: Twenty-five patient
s with well-defined primary biliary cirrhosis mere randomly assigned t
o receive either ursodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day) plus methotrexate (
10 mg/week) or ursodeoxycholic acid plus placebo for a period of 48 we
eks, Clinical, biochemical and histologic evolution were assessed, Res
ults: In both groups the clinical response was similar and heterogeneo
us, In patients of ursodeoxycholic acid alone group, biochemical and h
istologic changes mere comparable to those of patients of ursodeoxycho
lic acid plus methotrexate at 48 weeks, The addition of methotrexate w
as not associated with substantial adverse affects, Conclusions: The u
se of methotrexate in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid was not fo
llowed by an additive benefit over ursodeoxycholic acid alone, nor was
substantial toxicity added, Unless larger and longer controlled trial
s with clinical, biochemical and histologic controls show it to be a s
afe and effective therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxychol
ic acid+methotrexate should not be used as a proven and accepted treat
ment.