A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model

Citation
S. Chinpairoj et al., A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model, LARYNGOSCOP, 111(2), 2001, pp. 213-217
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
LARYNGOSCOPE
ISSN journal
0023852X → ACNP
Volume
111
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
213 - 217
Database
ISI
SICI code
0023-852X(200102)111:2<213:ACOMET>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to compare collateral t issue damage and wound healing in incisions created by electro-dissociation and conventional electrosurgery. Conventional electrosurgery has been used as an alternative to the scalpel to improve hemostasis. However, the heat generated by this instrument can cause tissue damage surrounding the incisi on, limiting its use around nerves and large blood vessels A new technology , Coblation (Arthrocare Corp., Sunnyvale, CA), uses "electro-dissociation" to achieve similar results by creating charged particles from a conductive medium to make an incision while simultaneously achieving hemostasis. This new approach to electrosurgery may reduce soft tissue damage. Study Design Methods: Two prospective, matched design experiments were performed. In exp eriment I, both devices were set at the same electrical power in watts and then used to create an incision on the tongue of rats. In experiment II, th e electrical power settings of both devices were adjusted until they create d incisions of the same size. Epithelial destruction and collateral tissue damage were measured in histologically prepared tissue in both experiments, and the wound healing process was observed in experiment II at 0, 3, 7, an d 14 days after surgery. Results: The results showed that the electro-disso ciation method created significantly less epithelial destruction and collat eral tissue damage in both experiments. Granulation tissue formation was al so significantly less extensive in the electro-dissociation-induced incisio n after 7 and 14 days of recovery. Conclusions: Wound healing may be faster than with conventional electrosurgery if the Coblation device is used.