Aj. Tector et al., Rejection of pig liver xenografts in patients with liver failure: Implications for xenotransplantation, LIVER TRANS, 7(2), 2001, pp. 82-89
The pathophysiological state of rejection in liver xenotransplantation is p
oorly understood. Data from clinical pig liver perfusion suggest that pig l
ivers might be rejected less vigorously than pig hearts or kidneys. Pig liv
ers used in clinical xenoperfusions were exposed to blood from patients wit
h liver failure. We have shown in an animal model that transplant recipient
s with liver failure are less capable of initiating hyperacute rejection of
a xenografted liver than a healthy transplant recipient. The goal of this
report is to examine the pathological characteristics of pig livers used in
2 clinical pig liver perfusions and combine this information with in vitro
studies of pig-to-human liver xenotransplantation to determine whether the
findings in the perfused pig livers could be explained in part by the dimi
nished capacity of the patient with liver failure to respond to xenogeneic
tissue. Pathological analysis of the perfused pig livers showed immunoglobu
lin M deposition in the sinusoids with little evidence of complement activa
tion. Our in vitro studies showed that serum from patients with liver failu
re caused less injury to pig liver endothelium than serum from healthy subj
ects. Serum from patients with liver failure had similar levels of xeno-rea
ctive antibodies as serum from healthy humans. Incubation of serum from pat
ients with liver failure with pig hepatic endothelial cells generated less
iC3b, Bb fragment, and C5b-9 than serum from healthy subjects. We conclude
that the altered injury in the perfused pig livers can be attributed to the
relative complement deficiency that accompanies liver failure.