Concurrent and construct validity of scores on the timed movement battery

Citation
Gl. Creel et al., Concurrent and construct validity of scores on the timed movement battery, PHYS THER, 81(2), 2001, pp. 789-798
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISSN journal
00319023 → ACNP
Volume
81
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
789 - 798
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9023(200102)81:2<789:CACVOS>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background and Purpose. The Timed Movement Battery (TMB) is a new assessmen t tool designed to measure mobility in elderly individuals. "Mobility" was defined as a person's ability to maneuver his or her body independently in order to accomplish everyday tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent and construct validity of scores obtained with the TMB as a measure of mobility in a group of elderly individuals who reported moderat e or no difficulty in performing either basic or instrumental activities of daily living (BADL or IADL). Subjects. Thirty community-dwelling elderly p eople, with a mean age of 77.5 years (SD=7.0, range=65-92), participated in this study. Methods. Subjects responded to 2 questionnaires regarding thei r activities of daily living (ADL) (ie, Barthel Index and an 18-item ADL/IA DL scale) and completed 3 assessments of mobility (ie, Berg Balance Scale, Timed "Up sc Go" Test, and the TMB). Subjects were asked to perform the ite ms on the TMB at a "self-selected" speed (their normal speed) and at a "max imum-movement" speed (as quickly as they could safely perform the items). S ubjects' scores on the TMB were cross-correlated with data for 3 criterion tests (ie, Berg Balance Scale, Timed " Up & Go" Test, Barthel Index, and th e 18-item ADL/IADL scale) using Spearman rank correlations and Pearson prod uct moment correlations. Results. Composite scores of the TMB performed at self-selected speeds correlated highly with data for the criterion tests an d differentiated between those subjects reporting difficulty with ADL and t hose reporting no difficulty. Conclusion and Discussion. These results supp ort the validity of scores obtained with the TMB as a measure of mobility i n this sample of elderly individuals with moderate or no reported difficult y with ADL.