Cj. Odom et al., Measurement of scapular asymmetry and assessment of shoulder dysfunction using the lateral scapular slide test: A reliability and validity study, PHYS THER, 81(2), 2001, pp. 799-809
Background and Purpose. The Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSST) is used to d
etermine scapular position with the arm abducted 0, 45, and 90 degrees in t
he coronal plane. Assessment of scapular position is based on the derived d
ifference measurement of bilateral scapular distances. The purpose of this
study was to assess the reliability of measurements obtained using the LSST
and whether they could be used to identify people with and without shoulde
r impairments. Subjects. Forty-six subjects ranging in age from 18 to 65 ye
ars (X=30.0, SD=11.1) participated in this study. One group consisted of 20
subjects being treated for shoulder impairments, and one group consisted o
f 26 subjects without shoulder impairments. Methods. Two measurements in ea
ch test position were obtained bilaterally. From the bilateral measurements
, we derived the difference measurement. Intraclass correlation coefficient
s (ICC [1,1]) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated f
or intrarater and interrater reliability of the difference in side-to-side
measures of scapular distance. Sensitivity and specificity of the LSST for
classifying subjects with and without shoulder impairments were also determ
ined. Results. The ICCs for intrarater reliability were .75, .77, and .80 a
nd .52, .66, and .62, respectively, for subjects without and with shoulder
impairments in 0, 45, and 90 degrees of abduction. The ICCs for interrater
reliability were .67, .43, and .74 and .79, .45, and .57, respectively, for
subjects without and with shoulder impairments in 0, 45 and 90 degrees of
abduction. The SEMs ranged from 0.57 to 0.86 cm for intrarater reliability
and from 0.79 to 1.20 cm for interrater reliability. Using the criterion of
greater than 1.0 cm difference, sensitivity and specificity were 35% and 4
8%, 41% and 54%, and 43% and 56%, respectively, for 0, 45, and 90 degrees o
f abduction. Sensitivity and specificity based on the criterion of greater
than 1.5 cm difference were 28% and 53%, 50% and 58%, and 34% and 52%, resp
ectively, for the 3 scapular positions. Conclusion and Discussion. Our resu
lts suggest that measurements of scapular positioning based on the differen
ce in side-to-side scapular distance measures are not reliable. Furthermore
, the results suggest that sensitivity and specificity of the LSST measurem
ents are poor and that the LSST should not be used to identify people with
and without shoulder dysfunction.