Time-dependent responses of soil CO2 efflux components to elevated atmospheric [CO2] and temperature in experimental forest mesocosms

Citation
Gh. Lin et al., Time-dependent responses of soil CO2 efflux components to elevated atmospheric [CO2] and temperature in experimental forest mesocosms, PLANT SOIL, 229(2), 2001, pp. 259-270
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
PLANT AND SOIL
ISSN journal
0032079X → ACNP
Volume
229
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
259 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-079X(200102)229:2<259:TROSCE>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
We previously used dual stable isotope techniques to partition soil CO2 eff lux into three source components (rhizosphere respiration, litter decomposi tion, and soil organic matter (SOM) oxidation) using experimental chambers planted with Douglas-fir [ Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] seedlings. The components responded differently to elevated CO2 (ambient + 200 mu mol mol(-1)) and elevated temperature (ambient + 4 degreesC) treatments during the first year. Rhizosphere respiration increased most under elevated CO2, and SOM oxidation increased most under elevated temperature. However, many studies show that plants and soil processes can respond to altered climate s in a transient way. Herein, we extend our analysis to 2 years to evaluate the stability of the responses of the source components. Total soil CO2 ef flux increased significantly under elevated CO2 and elevated temperature in both years (1994 and 1995), but the enhancement was much less in 1995. Rhi zosphere respiration increased less under elevated temperature in 1995 comp ared with 1994. Litter decomposition also tended to increase comparatively less in 1995 under elevated CO2, but was unresponsive to elevated temperatu re between years. In contrast, SOM oxidation was similar under elevated CO2 in the 2 years. Less SOM oxidation occurred under elevated temperature in 1995 compared with 1994. Our results indicate that temporal variations can occur in CO2 production by the sources. The variations likely involve respo nses to antecedent physical disruption of the soil and physiological proces ses.