Falls are common in older subjects and result in loss of confidence and ind
ependence. The Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-specific Balan
ce Confidence scale (ABC) were developed in North America to quantify these
entities, but contain idiom unfamiliar to an older British population. Nei
ther has been validated in the UK. The FES and the ABC were modified for us
e within British culture and the internal consistency and test-retest relia
bility of the modified scales (FES-UK and ABC-UK) assessed. A total of 193
consecutive, ambulant, new, and return patients (n=119; 62%) and their frie
nds and relatives ("visitors", n=74; 38%) were tested on both scales, while
the last 60 subjects were retested within one week. internal reliability w
as excellent for both scales (Cronbach's alpha 0.97 (FES-UK), and 0.98 (ABC
-UK)). Test-retest reliability was good for both scales, though superior fo
r the ABC-UK (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.58 (FES-UK), 0.89 (ABC-U
K)). There was evidence to suggest that the ABC-UK was better than the FES-
UK at distinguishing between older patients and younger patients ( /t(ABC)/
= 4.4; /t(FES)/ = 2.3); and between fallers and non-fallers (/t(ABC)/ = 8.
7; /t(FES)/ = 5.0) where the t statistics are based on the comparison of tw
o independent samples. The ABC-UK and FES-UK are both reliable and valid me
asures for the assessment of fans and balance related confidence in older a
dults. However, better test-retest reliability and more robust differentiat
ion of subgroups in whom falls related qualify of life would be expected to
be different make the ABC-UK the current instrument of choice in assessing
this entity in older British subjects.