Manufacturing resource planning II (MRPII) is the most widely employed meth
odology for production planning and control. Many authors, however, have st
ated that the fundamental basis of MRPII is flawed: that is to say, schedul
ing is based on fixed manufacturing lead times/lot sizes with infinite capa
city. There has also been great interest in alternative methodologies such
as optimized production technology (OPT) which plans to finite capacity. As
a result, there are now several software houses who offer finite capacity
scheduling (FCS) tools designed to operate alongside MRPII packages. These
provide detailed finite capacity planning while retaining the database infr
astructure of MRPII. Such hybrids claim to give the benefits of FCS to esta
blished MRPII users without the need for re-implementation. This paper desc
ribes the operation of such hybrids. Based on a case study drawn from the a
utomotive components industry, it discusses the pitfalls that might be expe
rienced without careful consideration of planning methods in relation to Bi
ll of Material (BOM) structures. In particular, it shows that for a hybrid
to be successful, it is necessary to consider the system as a whole, rather
than considering FCS as a simple addition to MRPII.