A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance
Nr. Kuncel et al., A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance, PSYCHOL B, 127(1), 2001, pp. 162-181
This meta-analysis examined the validity of the Graduate Record Examination
s (GRE) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as predictors of gradu
ate school performance. The study included samples from multiple discipline
s, considered different criterion measures, and corrected for statistical a
rtifacts. Data from 1,753 independent samples were included in the meta-ana
lysis, yielding 6,589 correlations for 8 different criteria and 82,659 grad
uate students. The results indicated that the GRE and UGPA are generalizabl
y valid predictors of graduate grade point average, ist-year graduate grade
point average. comprehensive examination scores, publication citation coun
ts, and faculty ratings. GRE correlations with degree attainment and resear
ch productivity were consistently positive; however, some lower 90% credibi
lity intervals included 0. Subject Tests tended to be better predictors tha
n the Verbal, Quantitative, and Analytical tests.