Biomedicine is a global enterprise constructed upon the belief in the unive
rsality of scientific truths. However, despite huge scientific advances ove
r recent decades it has not been able to formulate a specific and universal
definition of death. In fact, in its attempt to redefine death, the concep
t of death appears to have become immersed in ever increasing vagueness and
ambiguity. Even more worrisome is that bioethics, in the form principlism,
is also endeavouring to become a global enterprise by claiming neutrality.
It appears that the discourse within both disciplines have similarly manip
ulated the boundaries of death to include the "dying". This paper argues th
at the redefinition of death debate in biomedicine reveals a concept of per
sonhood which is profoundly western in origin and which is in accordance to
the concept adhered to within principlism. Biomedicine and bioethics do no
t appear to acknowledge the limitations of their own world view and hence l
ack an understanding of their applicability and appropriateness in diverse
social and cultural contexts; a situation which adds credence to claims as
to the hegemonic and imperialistic nature of all such global enterprises.