The 'Redefinition of death' debate: Western concepts and western bioethics

Citation
Sf. Jones et As. Kessel, The 'Redefinition of death' debate: Western concepts and western bioethics, SCI ENG ETH, 7(1), 2001, pp. 63-75
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,Multidisciplinary,"Engineering Management /General",Philosiphy
Journal title
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
ISSN journal
13533452 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
63 - 75
Database
ISI
SICI code
1353-3452(200101)7:1<63:T'ODDW>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Biomedicine is a global enterprise constructed upon the belief in the unive rsality of scientific truths. However, despite huge scientific advances ove r recent decades it has not been able to formulate a specific and universal definition of death. In fact, in its attempt to redefine death, the concep t of death appears to have become immersed in ever increasing vagueness and ambiguity. Even more worrisome is that bioethics, in the form principlism, is also endeavouring to become a global enterprise by claiming neutrality. It appears that the discourse within both disciplines have similarly manip ulated the boundaries of death to include the "dying". This paper argues th at the redefinition of death debate in biomedicine reveals a concept of per sonhood which is profoundly western in origin and which is in accordance to the concept adhered to within principlism. Biomedicine and bioethics do no t appear to acknowledge the limitations of their own world view and hence l ack an understanding of their applicability and appropriateness in diverse social and cultural contexts; a situation which adds credence to claims as to the hegemonic and imperialistic nature of all such global enterprises.