Background: Under-representation of ethnic minority groups in psychiatric s
ervices has been widely reported in Western nations. The present study exam
ined whether there were differences between immigrant and Australian-born p
atients in their maintenance of contact with a statewide psychiatric servic
e system. Methods: Groups were selected on the empirical grounds that they
are differently represented in this service system. Employing a form of cas
e-control design, four groups of patients were compared: those born in Aust
ralia, the United Kingdom, Southern Europe, and South East/East Asia respec
tively (n = 79 for each). Groups were identically matched on sex, age, diag
nosis (either schizophrenia or bipolar illness) and locality of service. Th
e groups did not differ as to the timing of their first appearance in the 3
-year period in which their psychiatric contact was examined. Results: Desp
ite their different representation in the psychiatric service system, the f
our groups did not differ on measures of continuity of contact. Measures in
cluded number of contacts with mental health community services, number of
admissions to inpatient wards, length of stay in hospital and the longest i
nterval between any two successive service contacts. Conclusions: The commo
nly reported underrepresentation of immigrant groups in the psychiatric ser
vice system does not appear to be due to greater discontinuation of contact
with services. If the assumption of equal community prevalence of disorder
is made, then the observed under-representation may be due to differential
rates of access to (that is, initial contact with) psychiatric services.