Soil and plant tissues were used to examine the effect on the release of di
ssolved organic carbon (DOC) of rinsing over time at two temperatures and u
nder oxic and anoxic conditions in a laboratory incubation. The release of
DOC over 60 days of incubation ranged from 0.5 to 189 mg DOC g(-1) oven-dry
material and was correlated inversely with the degree of decomposition of
the material: fresh maple leaves > old maple leaves > Sphagnum moss > fibri
c peat > hemic peat sapric peat > Inceptisol A horizon. Rates of DOC releas
e were similar through the duration of the experiment, except for the fresh
maple leaves, where release rates fell after 3 day. Rinsing, by the replac
ement of water in the incubating samples after 20 day, produced slower rate
s of DOC release, except in the Inceptisol A and sapric peat samples. There
was no significant difference between DOC release under oxic and anoxic co
nditions, except for the Inceptisol A soil, where DOC release was greater u
nder anoxic than under oxic conditions. The rate of DOC release at 22 degre
esC was an average of 2.4 times greater than at 4 degreesC, translating int
o Q(10) values of about 1.6. At 22 degreesC under oxic conditions, DOC prod
uction accounted for 14 to 58% (average 24%) of the total C released as DOC
+ CO2, with the highest proportion in the maple leaves. Under anoxic condi
tions, DOC production accounted for 63 to 95% (average 82%) of the total C
released as DOC + CO2 + CH4. Production of CH4 under anoxic conditions was
minor, accounting for <1% of the total C released. Under oxic conditions at
22 <degrees>C, the incubations released between 2 and 107% of the organic
C contained in the samples, the largest proportion of which was released fr
om the plant tissues. Microbial utilization of DOC meant that some C was do
uble-counted, both as DOC and as subsequently emitted CO2 Under anoxic cond
itions, 0.0 to 49% of the sample organic C was mineralized. The release of
DOC represents the balance between production, adsorption, and desorption a
nd microbial utilization. This release differs clearly among samples and am
ong treatment effects.